I’m voting against. Having said that, thank you for explaining your proposal in depth.
A few days ago I published some thoughts and suggestions in order to identify and form guiding principles for Yearn. One of the things I identified as a key area is efficient governance. My point is that there is a strong argument to keep complexity and coordination cost very low in governance. Keep it simple. When I read the proposal, it seems to add a lot of complexity and coordination cost. Therefore I’m against.
From my post:
There is a tradeoff between speed and agility on one side and transparency and consensus on the other. The cost of coordination is high. Therefore one goal should be maximum autonomy and ownership to the smallest possible unit. This means that we should allow for personal ownership and responsibility to the largest extent, and keep most coordination tasks to small teams. When possible, decisions should be taken by the person closest to the action.