Deriswap + StableCredit

If the goal of the ongoing “mergers” is to aggregate liquidity and avoid redundant code, why is Yearn working on both Deriswap (to be hosted by SushiSwap) and StableCredit (to be hosted by Cream)?

Wouldn’t it make more sense to focus on building a single market with the maximum possible liquidity (presumably by adding derivatives to StableCredit)?

This topic was automatically closed 7 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.