Governance Overhaul and Future Rewards

I agree with making voting easier and also with gYFI rewarding longer term thinkers.

I do not support allowing governance votes from anyone who is not using the core staking contract. Creating ban lists for exchanges etc is an unsustainable exercise. I also do not support YFI voting when it is bound in any other lending protocol gaining yield. Many here talk about the double vote problem, but ultimately, obtaining yield reduces the true cost of a governance attack (hedge downside). The sole purpose of YFI should be to govern and if someone chooses to create leverage as collateral, then that must come at the opportunity cost of staking for governance rights. This ensures skin in the game. One must not be able to pass an adverse proposal without wearing the market price reaction.

Support accessibility.
Do not support yield bearing governance nor an attempt at implementing banlists as a mitigation.

11 Likes