I loved the idea and the vision behind it.
At the same time, the other side of the argument by @DegenTec is also true. And the idea of keeping it as an option (in two different strategies) is a very fair point (if possible).
But I would like to emphasis on the importance of the above quote. If the vision done right, this will not only have altruistic impact to the ecosystem as explained by @redarmanino, but also will add value to Yearn’s vault strategies. How? If we could influence the protocols that we depend on, then we could streamline them in a way that provides highest value/yield to the vaults. In other words, we could reduce protocol frictions from completing in their own silos, and tweak them to fit into a bigger picture as we see fit.
The end goal shall always be the same: Increasing and sustaining the yield.
This way everyone is winning, builders and investors.
Edit: I’ve just read this post and I think it is a good reference for the political side. specially @dudesahn response.