Hi fren, FWIW, if you need some input to choose which contract could be added to yearn. The Nexus Mutual tracks could help here to estimate demand for cover in the current market.
From the Active Cover Amount per Contract - contract with the bigger outstanding assurance - The most taken are :
1 Aave (9,17M) - NOT PROPOSED
2 Curve (11,35) -Already included in Yearn insurance
3 Yearn (9,05M) - Already included in Yearn insurance
4 Synthetix (5,68M) - Already included in Yearn insurance
5 Balancer (~45M) - Already included in Yearn insurance
6 Compound (~2,64M) - Already included in Yearn insurance
7 REN (~2,32M) - Proposed
8 Maker (~1,45M) - NOT PROPOSED
9 1inch.exchange (~1,21M) - Proposed
The premium pay offer some views on those contract with some demand ( ppl willing to pay high premium) but with a lack of cover (too small NXM staking pool implying higher pricing)
I ask myself why Aave, which is the first cover demand, is not inclued on yearn insurance?